In 2025, the Quality Management Department worked closely with production operations and collaborated with all workshops to comprehensively review and optimize the existing operational standards, further promoting the standardization and normalization of on-site operations.
| e Item | 2025 |
| Operational Standards Reviewed - Hull Workshop | 76 files |
| Operational Standards Reviewed - Mechanical& Electrical Workshop | 20 files |
| Operational Standards Reviewed - Coating Workshop | 40 files |
| Newly Added Operational Standards | 7 files |
Risk Prevention
COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industry (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. adheres to the management principle of “prevention first, combining prevention with control.” Focusing on key factors such as new vessel types, new processes, new materials, new equipment, and new suppliers, the company has established and improved an incoming quality risk identification and control mechanism, moving risk identification and prevention to the project initiation and supply chain management stages to prevent and reduce quality risks at the source.
Relevant incoming quality risks have been incorporated into the Management Measures for Product Quality Risk Identification, Assessment and Control Measures and the Management Provisions for External Suppliers of Offshore Engineering Projects, achieving standardized and institutionalized management.
Measures Risk Identification FAT Control Incoming Material Inspection The company identified 33 The company completed 24 The company strictly implemented incoming quality risks in advance Factory Acceptance Tests (FAT) dual incoming material inspections for methanol dual-fuel vessels for offshore engineering and by the Materials Department and critical components of methanol projects, identified and the Quality Management offshore engineering projects and recorded 87 comments, and Department. From January to and formulated full-process achieved a comment closure rate December, 5,313 batches of control measures covering of 9 7 . 7 % , effectively preventing incoming materials were inspected pre-identification, in-process equipment with defects from before warehousing, ensuring inspection, and post-completion entering the shipyard. strict control over the quality of verification. raw materials.
Process Control
Supported by its quality management system, the company has implemented an “all-staff, whole-process, and all-round” quality management model. Through measures such as implementing the Authorized Inspector System, promoting the development of Self-Inspection Exempt Teams, strictly implementing the three-level inspection system, and conducting special quality inspection tours, the company has strengthened quality control throughout the entire construction process, continuously improved the self-managed quality capabilities of workshops, and effectively enhanced employees' quality awareness and overall execution capabilities.
T h e c o m p a n y a d o p t e d a training model combining t h e o r y a n d p ra c t i ce a n d Developed 28 standardized training materials for 心 awarded dedicated helmet s t i c k e r s t o a u t h o r i z e d authorized inspectors across all workshops. Authorized inspectors who passed the a s s e s s m e n t , e f f e c t i v e l y Organized 12 rounds of training with 415 pector System strengthening quality control a n d s e l f - m a n a g e m e n t participants. capabilities at the frontline team level. The company comprehensively evaluated the operation of existing self-inspection exempt teams, drew on best practices I^ from peer companies, optimized the lf-Inspection Implementation Rules for the Management Established 12 self-inspection of Self-Inspection Exempt Teams, and Exempt Team exempt teams. promoted the establishment of selfDevelopment inspection exempt teams across workshops to set benchmarks for excellent construction practices. c T h e co m pa n y ca r r i e d o u t Conducted a total of 157 quality inspection tours monthly special self-inspection tours to strengthen independent across all production lines. Quality Inspection quality control at construction Tours sites. Rectified 7,181 on-site quality issues.
Skills Development
COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industry (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. has established a tiered and categorized quality training system. Relying on diversified platforms such as skills competitions, QC groups, and TQC improvement activities, the company has systematically enhanced employees’ professional skills and quality management capabilities, striving to build a high-quality quality management team and continuously fostering a strong culture in which everyone values quality and everyone contributes to quality.
Tiered Training Delivered with Tangible Results
The company organized 129 “Production Management and Overall Quality” training sessions for management personnel, covering 4,405 participants, effectively enhancing the quality awareness and management capabilities of the management team.
Meanwhile, all departments organized 151 quality training sessions with 47,232 participant attendances, comprehensively improving the professional skills and quality awareness of construction personnel.
Quality Teams Established
In 2025, the company collaborated with the Production, Technology, Workshops, Assets, Materials, and Digital Intelligence departments to establish 20 QC groups.
A total of 47 TQC improvement projects were carried out during the year, achieving a 100 % completion rate.
Skills Enhancement and Professional Certification
To meet production needs, the company organized personnel on a regular basis to obtain professional certifications such as CWI, NACE, and COMPEX, as well as classification society welder qualifications. At present, the company holds various professional qualification certificates and 456 classification society welder qualification certificates, providing talent support for high-quality construction. The company also organized ±b { 8 } skills competitions jointly with all workshops, involving 243 participant attendances, effectively improving the skills of construction personnel and fostering a quality culture of learning, benchmarking, and continuous improvement.
During the Quality Month, the company organized a series of themed activities under the theme of “Advocating Quality and Pursuing Excellence.” The activities covered quality promotion, themed signature campaigns, skills competitions, innovation achievement presentations, and warning education through case studies, comprehensively strengthening quality awareness among all employees and promoting the spirit of craftsmanship and the pursuit of excellence.
In addition, the company strictly followed the Group's arrangements by actively participating in quality management meetings and specialized training programs. Benchmarking against industry best practices and the outstanding experience of peer companies, the company continuously optimized its quality philosophy and further promoted a company-wide quality management culture.
Quality Honors
2025 Shanghai Marine Equipment Vocational Skills Competition
An employee from the Service Workshop won the Bronze Medal in the Hoisting and Loading Machinery Operator event.
An employee from the Mechanical & Electrical Workshop received the Excellence Award in the Ship Machinery Assembler event.
COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industry (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. was recognized as an Outstanding Organization of the 2025 Shanghai Marine Equipment Vocational Skills Competition.
Jiangsu Marine Transportation Industry Vocational Skills Competition and the 8th “COSCO SHIPPING Cup” Employee Skills Competition
Won five Third Prizes.
Won the Second Prize in the COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industry “AI ^ + Work Safety” Application Innovation Labor Competition.
Customer Service
COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industry (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. has continuously optimized its service system. In 2025, the company enhanced customers’ on-site service experience by upgrading reception facilities such as the office building and dining hall. It conducted company-wide business etiquette training to standardize service practices, implemented a“one-to-one” project manager system to provide dedicated services throughout the entire project process, and established a closedloop service management mechanism to continuously improve customer satisfaction.
At the same time, the company actively explored value-added technical services and continued to deepen customer cooperation through professional, efficient, and high-quality services.
2025
Ship Repair Project Customer Satisfaction 9 9 . 7 %
Offshore Engineering Project Customer Satisfaction 98.45%
Customer Commendation Letters Received 64
Space Transformation, Service Upgrade!
New Office Facilities of COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industry (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. Officially Launched
Supplier Management
Compliance Management
The company has established a rigorous supplier sanctions screening mechanism. All procurement personnel use the Compliance Risk Management System to conduct full-process risk screening at key stages, including supplier onboarding, contract execution, and foreign currency payments. The company regularly updates relevant international policies and conducts compliance training for employees to strengthen risk awareness across the workforce. At the same time, it organizes training sessions for suppliers on compliance risk management relating to relevant international policies and requires suppliers to sign compliance declarations and commitment letters, building a coordinated compliance management system across the supply chain.
Performance Evaluation
The company has continuously enhanced supply chain resilience by strictly implementing annual and routine supplier evaluations, rigorously controlling supplier admission, and improving long-term cooperation and dynamic management mechanisms. Based on suppliers’ historical cooperation records, daily performance, and annual evaluation results, the company has implemented full-cycle supplier management, completed the annual supplier review, and increased the sampling ratio for routine evaluations, continuously optimizing the supplier structure and ensuring the overall competitiveness of the supplier pool.
2025
Suppliers Eliminated or Frozen 117
New Suppliers Added 153
Qualified Approved Suppliers 350
欢
To meet the needs of methanol dual-fuel retrofitting projects, the company gave priority to introducing suppliers of key components certified by classification societies.
9
The company established a risk early warning mechanism. In response to the long supply chains and rapid technological iterations of new energy equipment, it set inventory warning thresholds for key components and established a list of alternative suppliers.
The company promoted green energy procurement by giving priority to clean energy sources such as pipeline natural gas.
0
The company strengthened collaborative carbon footprint management by promoting the inclusion of supply chain enterprises in the carbon footprint accounting system, requiring suppliers to provide carbon emission data for raw materials, and giving priority to enterprises certified as green factories, such as suppliers of marine steel and composite materials, including leading green manufacturers such as Shougang Group and Nanjing Iron & Steel Co., Ltd.
The company promoted suppliers' certification to ISO 14067 (Carbon Footprint) or ISO 50001 (Energy Management) and incorporated certification results into the procurement evaluation system. For example, battery suppliers were required to provide battery recycling and disposal plans.
Quality Collaboration
A supplier non-conformance information collection mechanism has been established to support suppliers in improving product quality through initiatives such as thematic workshops and quality collaboration. Key inspection checkpoints and quality control procedures have been standardized to strengthen quality assurance.
The Company has fully implemented the EP online procurement platform for marine materials. The approval process has been integrated into the CIIP system and connected with the Group's compliance management system, enabling standardized, digitalized, and compliant management throughout the entire procurement process.
2025
Collected 3 4 cases of negative supplier performance information, dynamically reflecting supplier performance and supporting timely response.
Conducted 22 special quality issue review meetings to support suppliers in improving product quality.
Organized \bullet quality co-development activities for key material suppliers and subcontractors.
Reviewed 58 subcontracting projects, identified key inspection points, and standardized the quality control process for subcontracted products.
Annual Outstanding Partner Appreciation Conference
COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industry (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. attaches great importance to the development of its subcontractor workforce. In January 2025, the company held the 2024 Annual Outstanding Partner Appreciation Conference under the theme of “Working Together with One Vision for Shared Prosperity, Mutual Benefit, and Common Growth.” Members of the company's management team, middle management from various departments, industry partners, and 150 representatives from 86 subcontractors gathered to discuss development and celebrate achievements.
During the conference, a number of subcontracting companies and individuals with outstanding performance in areas such as safety and quality were recognized and commended.
Industry Collaboration
COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industry (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. has always adhered to the development philosophy of openness, sharing, and collaborative innovation. The company is committed to actively sharing cutting-edge technological achievements and practical experience with industry partners, strengthening technical exchanges, resource complementarity, and strategic cooperation, and working together to promote the green, low-carbon, safe, and efficient development of the industry and advance its high-quality development.
Participation in Marintec China with On-site Presentations
In 2025, COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industr y (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. signed a Memorandum of Cooperation on Green Technology Retrofit with the China Classification Society (CCS) to carry out in-depth cooperation in frontier fields such as alternative fuel applications and low-carbon ship retrofits. Both parties fully integrated their technological, resource, and market advantages to jointly promote the demonstration, design, and approval of green retrofit solutions. By establishing industry technology benchmarks, expanding market
competitiveness, building a collaborative ecosystem, jointly overcoming key technical barriers, and leading the low-carbon transformation of the shipping industry, the cooperation has continuously enhanced China's core competitiveness and industry influence in the international green ship retrofit sector.
Experience Sharing on Methanol Dual-Fuel Retrofitting of Large Container Ships
At the experience-sharing seminar on the first 20K TEU container ship methanol dual-fuel retrofitting project organized by the COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industry Research Institute, the Technology R&D Center shared experience with other ship repair enterprises on key topics including retrofitting design, methanol fuel supply system design and commissioning, and classification society requirements and inspections.
The COSCO SHIPPING Heavy Industry Research Institute also organized an on-site visit to the company's 13.8K TEU methanol retrofitting project.
Appendix
Performance Data Table
| Indicator Unit 2023 2024 | |||
| Governance Indicators | |||
| Number of Management Members Average Tenure of Management Members | Persons 10 13 Years 2.7 2.8 | ||
| Management Member Turnover Rate | % 0 | ||
| Number of Employees Receiving Compliance Training | Persons 85 | ||
| Number of Compliance Training Sessions Organized by the Company | Sessions 5 | ||
| Percentage of Governance Body Members Communicated | % 100 | ||
| with Anti-corruption Policies and Procedures Pereptione ofisinesPrtnersCommunicatedwithAnti- | % 100 | ||
| Percentage of Governance Body Members Receiving Anti- corruption Training | % 100 | ||
| Total Number of Employees Receiving Anti-corruption Training | Persons 817 1,770 | ||
| Percentage of Employees Receiving Anti-corruption Training | % 100 | ||
| Number of Anti-corruption Training Sessions | Sessions 11 | ||
| Total Number of Confirmed Corruption Incidents | Cases 0 | ||
| Total Number and Monetary Value of Fines Paid Due to Violations During the Reporting Period | RMB 0 10,000 | ||
| Number of Information Security Audits | Sessions 2 | ||
| Environmental Indicators | |||
| Liquefied Gas | Tons | 824.65 638.28 827.94 | |
| Diesel | Tons | 4,345.45 5,142.00 5,415.07 | |
| Gasoline | Tons 124.23 | 112.12 68.9 | |
| Purchased Heat | GJ / | 18,033.17 22,218.90 | |
| On-site Photovoltaic Self-generated Electricity | kWh 0 | 200,441.60 3,361,333.60 | |
| Indicator | Unit | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
| Environmental Indicators | ||||
| Net Purchased Electricity | kWh | 78,198,200 | 57,695,357 | 73,294,507.74 |
| Purchased Green Electricity | kWh | / | 8,000,000 | 20,397,323.00 |
| Direct Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 1) | tCOe | 16,509.05 | 19,817.06 | 22,391.85 |
| Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 2)- Location-based | tCO2e | 34,146.08 | 32,942.98 | 41,604.27 |
| Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 2)- Market-based | tCO2e | / | 31,085 | 35,005.01 |
| Other Indirect Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Scope 3) | tcOe | / | 2,078.06 | 3,539.81 |
| Total Water Withdrawal | 10,000 Tons | 116.42 | 119.53 | 101.38 |
| Total Wastewater Discharge | Tons | 338,853 | 402,752 | 470,881 |
| Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD) | Tons | 7.168653 | 10.82 | 13.55 |
| Ammonia Nitrogen | Tons | 0.926 | 4.1 | 4.84 |
| Total General Solid Waste | Tons | 13,347.56 | 7,567.00 | 8,689.04 |
| Total Hazardous Waste | Tons | 974.4433 | 1,717.40 | 1,266.02 |
| Social Indicators | ||||
| Number of Complaints Received Regarding Products and Services | Cases | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Number of Product Recall Events | Cases | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| BusinestoCveedbyQaityamentt | % | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Customer Satisfaction Survey- Offshore Engineering and New Energy Development Department | / | 97.5 | 99.75 | 98.45 |
| CustarmeSatisfactioSureShipReaisins | / | / | 99.73 | 99.7 |
| Total Number of Confirmed Complaints Related to Customer Privacy Violations | Cases | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Complaints Confirmed by the Organization from External Parties | Cases | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Number of Incidents Violating Lawsand/or Voluntary Codes Related to Marketing (including Advertising, Promotion and Sponsorship) | Cases | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Indicator | Unit | 2023 2024 | 2025 | |
| Social Indicators | ||||
| Labor Contract Signing Rate | % | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Percentage of Employees Covered by Collective Bargaining Agreements | % | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Number of Operating Sites Subject to Labor Rights Review or Labor Rights Impact Assessment | Sites | 2 | 2 | 2 |
| PrabrRigfSpatigSitesSubjectoborRightsReview | % | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Return-to-work Rate of Employees Taking Parental Leave | % | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Retention Rate of Employees Taking Parental Leave | % | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| Total Number of Discrimination Incidents Reported During the Reporting Period | Cases | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total Number of Employees | Persons | 954 | 969 | 975 |
| Total Number of Male Employees | Persons | 880 | 892 | 897 |
| Total Number of Female Employees | Persons | 74 | 77 | 78 |
| Employees under Labor Contract System | Persons | 874 | 907 | 914 |
| Employees under Labor Dispatch System | Persons | 62 | 62 | 61 |
| Others | Persons | 18 | 0 | 0 |
| Employees Aged 51 and Above | Persons | 263 | 279 | 291 |
| Employees Aged 41-50 | Persons | 348 | 352 | 349 |
| Employees Aged 31-40 | Persons | 264 | 232 | 203 |
| Employees Aged 30 and Below | Persons | 79 | 106 | 132 |
| Employees with Bachelor’ s Degree or Above | Persons | 400 | 432 | 453 |
| Employees with Junior College Degree | Persons | 246 | 252 | 246 |
| Employees with Secondary School Education or Below | Persons | 308 | 285 | 276 |
| Total Number of Frontline Employees | Persons | 895 | 910 | 919 |
| Total Number of Middle Management Employees | Persons | 49 | 46 | 44 |
| Total Number of Senior Management Employees | Persons | 10 | 13 | 12 |
| Indicator | Unit | 2023 | 2024 | 2025 |
| Social Indicators | ||||
| Production Employees | Persons | 568 | 569 | 568 |
| Sales Employees | Persons | 33 | 33 | 33 |
| Technical Employees | Persons | 89 | 83 | 102 |
| Finance Employees | Persons | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Administrative Employees | Persons | 133 | 136 | 144 |
| Service Employees | Persons | 20 | 20 | 0 |
| Others | Persons | 95 | 112 | 112 |
| Employee Turnover Rate | % | 1.57 | 1.14 | 1.23 |
| Total Number of Employees Receiving Training | Persons | 881 | 969 | 975 |
| External Training | Sessions | / | / | 50 |
| Internal Training | Sessions | / | / | 103 |
| Male Employees Receiving Training | Persons | 815 | 809 | 897 |
| Female Employees Receiving Training | Persons | 66 | 64 | 78 |
| Frontline Employees Receiving Training | Persons | 824 | 816 | 919 |
| Middle Management Employees Receiving Training | Persons | 46 | 45 | 44 |
| Senior Management Employees Receiving Training | Persons | 11 | 12 | 12 |
| Total Training Hours Received by Employees | Hours | 66,602 | 125,188 | 112,067 |
| Average Training Hours per Employee | Hours | 75.6 | 129.19 | 115.5 |
| Total Training Hours Received by Male Employees | Hours | 61,613 | 62,279 | 103,595 |
| Total Training Hours Received by Female Employees | Hours | 4,989 | 4,921 | 9,012 |
| Total Training Hours Received by Frontline Employees | Hours | 60,535 | 61,701 | 105,507 |
| Total Training Hours Received by Middle Management Employees | Hours | 4,692 | 4,275 | 5,456 |
| Total Training Hours Received by Senior Management Employees | Hours | 1,375 | 1,224 | 1,644 |
| Indicator Unit 2023 2024 | |||||
| Social Indicators | |||||
| Percentage of Employees Receiving Regular Performance and Career Development Reviews | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Percentage of Employees and Non-employees Whose Work and/or Workplace Is Controlled by the Organization Covered by Management Systems | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Percentage of Employees and Non-employees Whose Work and/or Workplace Is Controlled by the Organization Covered by Internally Audited Management Systems | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Percentage of Employees and Non-employees Whose Work and/or Workplace Is Controlled by the Organization Covered by Externally Audited or Certified Management Systems | % | 100 | 100 | 100 | |
| Number of Work-related Fatalities | Persons | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Work-related Fatality Rate | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Number of High-consequence Work-related Injuries (Excluding Fatalities) | Persons | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Rate of High-consequence Work-related Injuries (Excluding Fatalities) | % | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Number of Recordable Work-related Injuries | Cases | 15 | 17 | 16 | |
| Recordable Work-related Injury Rate per Millon Working Hours | / | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.99 | |
| Number of Deaths Resulting from Work-related Health Issues | Persons | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Employees in Occupational Disease Risk Positions | Persons | 4,352 | 4,060 | 4,616 | |
| Employees Participating in Occupational Health Examinations | Persons | 4,352 | 4,060 | 4,616 | |
| Number of Employees Diagnosed with Occupational Diseases | Persons | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Safety Production Investment | RMB 10,000 | 449.92 | 669.03 | 743.99 | |
| Total Number of Suppliers | Companies | 1,412 | 1,176 | 1,388 | |
| Total Number of Confirmed Incidents of Violations of Indigenous Peoples’Rights During the Reporting Period | Cases | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
GRI Standards Content Index
| GRI STANDARD | ITEM | DISCLOSURE | LOCATION |
| GRI 2: | 2-1 | Organizational details | Company Profile |
| 2-2 | Entities included in the organization’ s sustainability reporting | About This Report | |
| 2-3 | Reporting period,frequency and contact point | About This Report | |
| 2-4 | Restatements of information | Performance Data Table | |
| 2-5 | External assurance | Assurance Statement | |
| 2-6 | Activities, value chain and other business relationships | About This Report | |
| 2-7 | Employees | Talent Development and Cultivation | |
| 2-8 | Workers who are not employees | Not applicable | |
| 2-9 | Governance structure and composition | Corporate Governance | |
| 2-10 | Nomination and selection of the highest governance body | Confidentiality constraints | |
| 2-11 General Disclosures | Chair of the highest governance body | Corporate Governance | |
| 2-12 | Role of the highest governance body in overseeing the management of impacts | ESG Management | |
| 2-13 | Delegation of responsibility for managing impacts | ESG Management | |
| 2-14 | Role of the highest governance body in sustainability reporting | ESG Management | |
| 2-15 | Conflicts of interest | Corporate Governance | |
| 2-16 | Communication of critical concerns | ESG Management | |
| 2-17 | Collective knowledge of the highest governance body | ESG Management | |
| 2-18 | Evaluation of the performance of the highest governance body | Confidentiality constraints | |
| 2-19 | Remuneration policies | Confidentiality constraints | |
| 2-20 | Process to determine remuneration | Confidentiality constraints |
| GRI STANDARD | ITEM | DISCLOSURE | LOCATION |
| GRI 2: General Disclosures | 2-21 | Annual total compensation ratio | Confidentiality constraints |
| 2-22 | Statement on sustainable development strategy | ESG Management and Relevant Chapters | |
| 2-23 | Policy commitments | ESG Management and Relevant Chapters | |
| 2-24 | Embedding policy commitments | ESG Management and Relevant Chapters | |
| 2-25 | Processes to remediate negative impacts | Stakeholder Engagement | |
| 2-26 | Mechanisms for seeking advice and raising concerns | Stakeholder Engagement | |
| 2-27 | Compliance with laws and regulations | Chapters of the Report | |
| 2-28 | Membership associations | Company Profile | |
| 2-29 | Approach to stakeholder engagement | ESG Management | |
| 2-30 | Collective bargaining agreements | Employee Rights and Interests | |
| GRI 3: Material Topics | 3-1 | Process to determine material topics | Identification of Material Issue |
| 3-2 | List of material topics | Identification of Material Issue | |
| 3-3 | Management of material topics | Identification of Material Issue and Relevant Chapters | |
| GRI 101: Biodiversity | 101-1 | Policies to halt and reverse biodiversity loss | Ecological Co-prosperity |
| 101-2 | Management of biodiversity impacts | Ecological Co-prosperity | |
| 101-3 | Access and benefit-sharing | Ecological Co-prosperity | |
| 101-4 | Identification of biodiversity impacts | Ecological Co-prosperity | |
| 101-5 | Locations with biodiversity impacts | Ecological Co-prosperity | |
| 101-6 | Direct drivers of biodiversity loss | Not applicable | |
| 101-7 | Changes to the state of biodiversity | Not applicable | |
| 101-8 | Ecosystem services | Not applicable | |
| GRl 201: Economic Performance | 201-1 | Direct economic value generated and | Confidentiality constraints |
| 201-2 | distributed Financial implications and other risks and opportunities due to climate change | Information unavailable / incomplete |
| GRI STANDARD | ITEM | DISCLOSURE | LOCATION |
| GRl 201: Economic Performance | 201-3 | Defined benefit plan obligations and other retirement plans | Employee Rights and Interests |
| 201-4 | Financial assistance received from government | Confidentiality constraints | |
| 202-1 | Ratios of standard entry level wage by gender compared to local minimum wage | Confidentiality constraints | |
| Presence GRI 203: Indirect | 202-2 | Proportion of senior management hired from the local community | Information unavailable / incomplete |
| 203-1 | Infrastructure investments and services supported | Social Contribution | |
| Economic Impacts GRl 204: Procurement Practices | 203-2 | Significant indirect economic impacts | Social Contribution |
| GRI 205: Anti- | 204-1 | Proportion of spending on local suppliers | Information unavailable / incomplete |
| 205-1 | Operations assessed for risks related to corruption | Performance Data Table | |
| 205-2 | Communication and training about anti- corruption policies and procedures | Business Ethics | |
| GRI 206: Anti- competitive Behavior | 205-3 206-1 | actions taken Legal actions for anti-competitive behavior, | Business Ethics Business Ethics |
| GRI 207: Tax | 207-1 | anti-trust,and monopoly practices Approach to tax | Corporate Governance |
| 207-2 | Tax governance, control,and risk | Corporate Governance | |
| 207-3 | management Stakeholder engagement and management | Corporate Governance | |
| 207-4 | of concerns related to tax Country-by-country reporting | Not applicable | |
| GRI 301: Materials | 301-1 | Materials used by weight or volume | Resource Conservation |
| 301-2 | Recycled input materials used | Resource Conservation | |
| 301-3 | Reclaimed products and their packaging materials | Resource Conservation | |
| GRI302: Energy | 302-1 | Energy consumption within the organization | Resource Conservation, Performance Data Table |
| GRI STANDARD | ITEM | DISCLOSURE | LOCATION |
| GRI 302: Energy | 302-2 | Energy consumption outside of the organization | Resource Conservation, Performance Data Table |
| 302-3 | Energy intensity | Not applicable | |
| 302-4 | Reduction of energy consumption | Resource Conservation | |
| 302-5 | Reductions in energy requirements of products and services | Climate Change Response, Resource Conservation | |
| 303-1 | Interactions with water as a shared resource | Resource Conservation | |
| GRl 303: Water and Effluents | 303-2 | Management of water discharge-related | Pollution Prevention and Control |
| 303-3 | impacts Water withdrawal | Performance Data Table | |
| 303-4 | Water discharge | Performance Data Table | |
| 303-5 | Water consumption | Information unavailable / | |
| GRl 305: Emissions | 305-1 | Direct (Scope 1) GHG emissions | incomplete Climate Change Response |
| 305-2 | Energy indirect (Scope 2) GHG emissions | Climate Change Response | |
| 305-3 | Other indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions | Climate Change Response | |
| 305-4 | GHG emissions intensity | Confidentiality constraints | |
| 305-5 | Reduction of GHG emissions | Climate Change Response | |
| 305-6 | Emissions of ozone-depleting substances (ODS) | Information unavailable / incomplete | |
| 305-7 | Nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), and other significantair emissions | Pollution Prevention and Control | |
| 306-1 | Waste generation and significant waste- related impacts | Pollution Prevention and Control | |
| GRI 306: Waste | 306-2 | Management of significant waste-related impacts | During the reporting period,all waste generated by the Company was properly disposed of in compliance with regulations,with |
| no significant actual or potential impacts involved | |||
| 306-3 | Waste generated | Pollution Prevention and Control, Performance Data Table |
| GRI STANDARD | ITEM | DISCLOSURE | LOCATION |
| GRI 306:Waste | 306-4 | Waste diverted from disposal | Pollution Prevention and Control, Performance Data Table |
| 306-5 | Waste directed to disposal | Pollution Prevention and Control, Performance Data Table | |
| 308-1 GRI 308: Supplier | New suppliers that were screened using environmental criteria | Supplier Management | |
| Environmental Assessment | 308-2 | Negative environmental impacts in the supply chain and actions taken | No suppliers with significant negative environmental impacts identified |
| 401-1 | New employee hires and employee turnover | Talent Development and Cultivation,Performance Data Table | |
| GRl 401: Employment | 401-2 | Benefits provided to full-time employees that are not provided to temporary or part- time employees | Employee Rights and Interests |
| 401-3 | Parental leave | ||
| GRI 402: Labor/ Management Relations | 402-1 | Minimum notice periods regarding operational changes | Information unavailable / incomplete |
| GRl 403: Occupational Health and Safety | 403-1 | Occupational health and safety management system | Occupational Health and Safety |
| 403-2 | Hazard identification, risk assessment,and incident investigation | Occupational Health and Safety | |
| 403-3 | Occupational health services | Occupational Health and Safety | |
| 403-4 | Worker participation, consultation,and communication on occupational health and safety | Occupational Health and Safety | |
| 403-5 | Wtetri | Occupational Health and Safety | |
| 403-6 | Promotion of worker health | Occupational Health and Safety | |
| 403-7 | Prevention and mitigation of occupational health and safety impacts directly linked by business relationships | Occupational Health and Safety | |
| 403-8 | Workers covered by an occupational health and safety management system | Occupational Health and Safety |
| GRI STANDARD | ITEM | DISCLOSURE | LOCATION |
| GRl 403: Occupational Health and Safety | 403-9 | Work-related injuries | Occupational Health and Safety |
| 403-10 | Work-related ill health | Occupational Health and Safety | |
| GRl 404: Training and Education | 404-1 | Average hours of training per year per employee | Talent Development and Cultivation,Performance Data Table |
| 404-2 | Programs for upgrading employee skills and transition assistance programs | Talent Development and Cultivation, Performance Data Table | |
| 404-3 | Percentage of employees receiving regular performance and career development reviews | Employee Rights and Interests, Performance Data Table | |
| GRI 405: Diversity and Equal Opportunity GRI 406: Non- | 405-1 | Diversity of governance bodies and employees | Performance Data Table |
| 405-2 | Ratio of basic salary and remuneration of women to men | Confidentiality constraints | |
| discrimination GRI 407: Freedom | 406-1 | Incidents of discrimination and corrective actions taken Operations and suppliers in which the right | Talent Development and Cultivation |
| of Association and Collective Bargaining | 407-1 | to freedom of association and collective bargaining may be at risk | Employee Rights and Interests No suppliers or operations |
| GRl 408: Child Labor | 408-1 | Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of child labor | identified with significant risk of child labor incidents No operating sites or suppliers |
| GRI 409: Forced or Compulsory Labor | 409-1 | Operations and suppliers at significant risk for incidents of forced or compulsory labor | identified with significant risks of forced or compulsory labor incidents |
| GRl 410: Security Practices | 410-1 | Security personnel trained in human rights policies or procedures | Information unavailable / incomplete |
| GRl 411: Rights of Indigenous Peoples | 411-1 | Incidents of violations involving rights of indigenous peoples | Not applicable |
| GRI 413: Local Communities | 413-1 | Operations with local community engagement,impact assessments,and development programs | Social Contribution |
| 413-2 | Operations with significant actual and potential negative impacts on local communities | No operating sites identified with actual or potential significant negative impacts |
| GRI STANDARD | ITEM | DISCLOSURE | LOCATION |
| GRl 414: Supplier Social Assessment | 414-1 | New suppliers that were screened using social criteria | Supplier Management |
| 414-2 | Negative social impacts in the supply chain and actions taken | No suppliers identified with significant negative social impacts | |
| GRl 415: Public Policy | 415-1 | Political contributions | Not applicable |
| GRl 416: Customer Health and Safety | 416-1 | Assessment of the health and safety impacts of product and service categories | Product Quality |
| 416-2 | Incidents of non-compliance concerning the health and safety impacts of products and services | Product Quality | |
| GRl 417: Marketing and Labeling | 417-1 | Requirements for product and service information and labeling | Climate Change Response,Product Quality |
| 417-2 | Incidents of non-compliance concerning product and service information and labeling | No incidents of non-compliance concerning product and service information and labeling | |
| 417-3 | Incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing communications | No incidents of non-compliance concerning marketing communications | |
| GRl 418: Customer Privacy | 418-1 | Substantiated complaints concerning breaches of customer privacy and losses of customer data | Information Security |
Carbon Verification Statement
DNV
VERIFICATIONOPINIONOF GREENHOUSEGAS STATEMENT
Opinion No.: Date of issue: 00020-2026-GHG-RGC 29April2026
Page 1of 5
Thisistoverify initiatereporting of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Inventory Report(2025)of
COSCO SHIPPING HEAVY INDUSTRY (SHANGHAI) CO., LTD
Scope ofVerification
DNV Business Assurance (DNV) has been Commissioned by COSCO SHIPPING HEAVY INDUSTRY (SHANGHAI) CO.,LTD.(hereafter the“Company") to performa verificationof theGHG Emissions Inventory Report (2025) (hereafter the"Inventory Report") in China,thescope of the verification is settothereporting boundarycovered bythis Inventory Report,asdetailedinAppendixA&Bof this opinion.
Verification CriteriaandGHG Programme
Theverification wasperformed onthe basis of ISO14064-1:2018,as wellas those given to provide forconsistent GHG emission identification,calculation,monitoringand reporting. Theimplementation processof the verification,isinaccordance withtherequirements of standards ofISO14066:2023,ISO14065:2020andIS014064-3:2019etc
VerificationOpinion
It isDNV's opinionthatthe Inventory Report,which was published in March 2026,is free from material discrepancies inaccordancewiththe verificationcriteriaidentifiedasstatedabove.The opinion isdecided based on the followingapproaches,
FortheDirect GHGemissions(Category1)andIndirectGHGemissionsfromimportedenergy(Category2), thereliabilityoftheinformationwithintheInventoryReportwereverifiedwithreasonablelevelof assurance. Forthe other Indirect GHG emissions (Category 3),the involved information was verified and tested using agreed-upon procedures (AUP). Inaddition,the information listed inattached AppendixA&B&Cwerealso verified during the process.
Place and date: Shanghai, 29 April 2026
Opinion No.:00020-2026-GHG-RGC Placeand date:Shanghai,29 April 2026
Page2 of 5
SupplementtoStatement
Processand Methodology
Thereviewsof the Inventory Reportand thesubsequent follow-up interviewshave provided DNVwith sufficient evidence to determine the fulfilment of stated criteria.
QuantificationofGreenhouse Gas Emission
TheInventoryReportcoveringtheperiodfrom01January2025to31December2025,itis DNV's opinion that the Inventory Report resultsinquantificationof GHG emissions that arereal, transparent and measurable.
Organizational BoundaryofVerification
□Financial Management Control区Operational Management Control□Equity Share
GHGsVerified
区CO2区CH4区N2O区HFCsPFCsSF6区NF3
| GHGInventory Categories | Amount (tCO2e) |
| Category 1-Direct GHG emissions1 | 22391.85 |
| Category2 Indirect GHG emissions from imported (market-based)2.1 | 35005.01 |
| Category Indirect GHG emissions from imported energy (location-based)2.2 | 41604.27 |
| Category 3- Indirect GHG emissions from transportation2 | 3539.81 |
| Total Emissions (market-based)34 | 60936.67 |
| Total Emissions (location-based)34 | 67535.93 |
.For details of the Direct GHG emissions please refer to Annex C.
2.Emissionsfrom transportationorganization were quantified based onthe Ecoinvent 3.12 andannounced in Announcementon 2023EmissonFactors for PowerGridin China by Ministryof Ecologyand Environmentand Bureau ofStatisticson31Dec.2025;2.1ForMarket-basedapproach:Purchasedgreenelectricityhasanemissionfactorof
0kgCO2e/kWh.Theremainingelectricityuses theResidualMix gridemissionfactorof0.6096kgCO2e/kWh;2.2For location-based approach:The grid emission factor of O.53o6 kgCO2e/kWh is applied.
3.Thescope of indirectemisionswasdefinedby Company'sownpre-determined criteriaforsignificanceof indirect emissions, considering the intended use of the GHG inventory.
4.The Global Warming Potential (GWP)100 year defined in IPCC AR6 has been chosen and refered by the company.
VerificationOpinion
区Verifiedwithout Qualification VerifiedwithQualification UnabletoVerify
Assurance Statement
Page 1of 2
Statement No.: DNV-2026-ASR-864392
Page 2 of 2
Statement No.: DNV-2026-ASR--864392
Independent Limited AssuranceStatement
DNV Business Assurance(China)Co.,td.(“DNV",“we"or“us") wereengaged byCOSCO SHING HAVYINDUSTRY (SHANGHAl) CO. LTD.the“Company)toconduct alimited assurance engagement overSelected Information presented in theCompany's2025 SustainablityReportand2O25GRlIndex (together,“theReport"),coveringthereportingyearended31December2025.The stakeholders of the Company are the intended users of this statement.
OurConclusion:Based on the procedures
nothing hascome to our attention that causes us to believe that the Selected Information is not fairly statedand hasnot been prepared,inallmaterialrespects,inaccordance withthe Criteria. This conclusion relates only tothe Selected Information,and is to be read in the context of this IndependentLimited Assurance Statement,inparticularthe inherent limitationsexplained verea
心
Selected information
The scope and boundary of our work is restricted to the key performance indicators included within the Report (the “Selected Information").
Liquefied gas(tonnes)
Diesel(tonnes)
Gasoline(tonnes)
Purchased heat(GJ)
On-site photovoltaic self-generated and self-consumed
electricity(kWh)
Net purchased electricity (kWh)
Purchased green electricity(kWh)
Total water withdrawal(10,oo tonnes)
Total volume of wastewater discharged[10,ooo tonnes)
Ourobservations and areas for improvement will be raised ina observationsare provided below.These observations do not affect our conclusion set out below:
The Company has established a variety of processes for collecting and consolidating the various data it reports and utilizes an information managementsystem to improve the reliabilityand quality of the data. In addition, the Company retires Green Electricity Certificates on a monthly basis. We have confidence in the process in place to ensure reasonable accuracyfor the information presented in the Report and management systems However, the scope of a small portion of the data disclosed in the Report is unclear.Itis recommended to further clarify data definitions, improve data continuity, and strengthen ctatisctical analysis of performance information to enhance sustainability management
Total number of employee(persons) Total number of female employee(persons) Employee turnover rate(%) 1 Number of work-related fatalities(persons) Number ofrecordable work-relatedinjuriestimes) Totalrecordable incident rate(%) , Total weight of general solid waste(tonnes) ■ Total weight of hazardous waste(tonnes) Number of external training sessions(times)
We performed a limited data only assurance engagement using the international assurance best practice including the International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000 - 'Assurance Engagements other than Audits and Reviews of Historical Financial Information’ (revised) issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board
Ourcompetence,independence and quality contro
DNV established policies and procedures are designed to ensure that DNV, its personnel and, where applicable, others are subject to independence requirements (including personnel of other entities of DNV) and maintain independence where required by relevant ethical requirements. This engagement work was carried out by an independent team of sustainability assurance professionals. Our multi-disciplinary team consisted of professionals with a combination of environmental and sustainability assurance experience.
To ensure consistency in our assurance process, we conducted our work in accordance with DNV's assurance methodology, Verisustain,applying onlythepertinentsections ofthe protocolrelevanttothespecific purpose of the activity.
This methodology ensures compliance with ethical requirements and mandatesplanningandexecution ofthe assuranceengagementtoobtain the desired level of assurance.
DNV applies its own management standards and compliance policies for quality control, which are based on the principles enclosed within ISO IEC 17029:2019-Conformity Assessment -General principlesand requirements for validation and verification bodies, and accordingly maintainsa comprehensive system of quality control including documented policies and procedures regarding compliance with ethical requirements,professionalstandards,and applicable legal and regulatory requirements.
The procedures performed in a limited assurance engagement vary in nature and timing from,and are lessin extent than for, a reasonable assurance engagement;and the level of assurance obtainedis substantially lower than the assurance that would have been obtained had a reasonable assurance engagement been performed. We planned and performed our work to obtain theevidence we considered sufficient to provide a basis for our opinion, so that the risk of this conclusion being in error is reduced but not reduced to very low.
Basis of our conclusion
We are required to plan and perform our work in order to consider the risk of material misstatement of the Selected Information; our work included, but was not restricted to:
Conducting interviews with the Company’s management to obtain an understanding of the key processes, systems and controls in place to generate, aggregate and report the Selected Information;
Paying site visits to the Company to review process and systems for preparing site level data;
Performing limited substantive testing on a selective basis of the Selected Information to check that data had been appropriately measured, recorded, collated and reprted;
Reviewing the specified data collected at Company level;
Reviewing that the evidence, measurements and their scope provided to us by the Company is prepared in line with the Criteria;
Assessing the appropriateness of the Criteria for the Selected Information, and
Reading the Report and narrative accompanying the Selected Information within it.
Wayne.Li Wavne Lead Verifier
Shanghai, China 11 May 2026
Inherent limitations
Allassurance engagements are subject to inherent limitations as selective testing (sampling) may not detect errors,fraud orother irrgularities.Nonfinancial data may be subject to greater inherent uncertainty than financial data, given the nature and methods used for calculating, estimating and determining such data. The selection of different, but acceptable, measurement techniques may result in different quantifications between different entities. Our assurance relies on the premise that thedata and information provided tous by the Company have been provided in good faith. DNV expressly disclaims any liability or co- responsibility for any decision a person or an entity may make based on this Independent Limited Assurance Statement.
Responsibilities of the management of th Company and DNV
The management of the Company has sole responsibility for:
· Preparing and presenting the Selected information in accordance with the Criteria;
. Designing, implementing and maintaining effective internal controls over the information and data,resulting in the preparation of the Selected Information that is free from material misstatements;
· Measuring and reporting the Selected Information based on their established Criteria, and
· Contents and statements contained within the Criteria.
Our responsibility is to plan and perform our work to obtain limited assurance about whether the Selected Information has been prepared in accordance with the Criteria and to report to the Company in the form of an independent limited assurance conclusion, based on the work performed and the evidence obtained. We have not been responsible for the preparation of the Report.
Management Representative
Ttateettefu signedineseso;efdseantepetatioetwetttsesftteet statement shall prevall,
DNVBusinessv, customers to build sustainable business performance. www.dnv.com




