REPORT ON FIRE RESISTANCE TEST OF DRY WALL PARTITION SYSTEM INCORPORATING METAL DOORSET

Client

: ABA ADVANCED MATERIAL GROUP CO.,LTD

Project

: Fire Resistance Test on Metal Doorset within Dry Wall Partition System in accordance with BS EN 1634-1:2014+A1:2018

Client Ref. : ABA BS EN 60 FIRE DOOR-GFM Report No. :G23245FU246120

Date of Report Issue : O8 Jul 2024

CONTENTS

Page

1. Introduction 安必安 医 1
2. Summary 1
安
3. Client Information 2
4. Test Specimen 2-14
5． Equipment 15
6. Test Procedure 安必安 16
7. Test Data and Information 17-27
安
8. Performance Criteria 28
造
9. Conclusion 29
10. Field of Direct Application of Test Results 30-32
11.Limitation 33
Appendix A - Test Photographs & 34-35

REPORTONFIRERESISTANCETEST

1. Introduction

Fugro Technical Services (Guangzhou） Limited was commissioned by ABA ADVANCED MATERIAL GROUP CO.,LTD to determine the fire resistance performance of a single-acting single-leaf,metal doorset with a glazed panel within a dry wall partition systemin accordance with BS EN 1634-1:2014+A1:2018.

The doorset is required to provide a fire separating function and the test was therefore conducted inaccordance with BS EN 1634-1:2014+A1:2018，‘Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies,openable windows and elements of building hardware - Part 1: Fire resistance tests for door and shutter assemblies and openable windows'.This test report should be read in conjunction with that Standard and with BS EN 1364-1:2015,‘Fire resistance tests for non-loadbearing elements - Part 1: Walls'，BS EN 1363-1: 2020,‘Fire resistance tests- Part 1: General requirement' and BS EN 1363-2: 1999, ‘Fireresistance tests-Part2:Alternative and additional procedures'.

The specimen was received on 24 June 2024 and given a Lab. Sample I.D.:FU246120.

The test was conducted at No.8， Hougang Industrial Street， Shachong，Dalong，Panyu, Guangzhou, China on 27 June 2024.

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

2. Summary

Theperformance of the dry wall partition system was judged against the criteria for integrityand insulation,as required by BS EN 1364-1:2015,and the resultsobtained were as follows:

The performance of the doorsets was judged against the criteria for integrityand insulation,as required by BS EN1634-1: 2 0 1 4 + A 1 : 2 0 1 8 ,and the results obtained were as follows:

The test was discontinued aftera period of 68 minutesat the request of the client.

ApprovedSignatory:

Yan Cai Sheng DeputyGeneralManager

DateofReportlssued:O8Jul2024

Client Ref. ABABS EN60 FIREDOOR-GFM Page 3of 35
Report No. G23245FU246120

3.Client Information

Client :ABAADVANCED MATERIALGROUPCO.,LTD
Client Address :Unit 202，Building 8，Zone D，Huaxin Huantu Science and Technology Innovation Island，No.64 Luntou Road，Haizhu District, Guangzhou City, Guangdong Province, China
Manufacturer : ABA NEW MATERIAL (GUANGDONG) CO., LTD
Manufacturer Address :No. 5 Land, No. 02-30 Linggang East Road, Southwest Industry Zone,Wencun Town, Taishan City, Guangdong Province, China

4. Test Specimen

Thespecimen had overall nominal dimensions 3 0 0 0 \ {mm } highby 2 4 9 5 {mm } wide by 9 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } thick.It incorporatedadoorsetofoverall nominal dimensionof 2 4 0 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } high by 1 2 0 0 ~ { {mm } } wide by 1 0 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } thick.The doorset of incorporated a door leaf of overall nominal dimensions of 2 3 6 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } high by 1 1 3 2 \mathsf {mm } wide by 4 5 \ : \mathsf {mm } thick.

Thedoor frame hadoverall sectional dimensionsof 4 5 \ \mathsf {mm } wideby 1 0 0 ~ { {mm } } thick with 15 mm deep rebate.The door frame was made of 1 . 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } thick galvanized steel sheet with fireproof materials infilled.The door frame was fixed to the supporting construction by M5 x 6 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } screws at maximum 5 0 0 ~ { {mm } } centre to centre.The gaps between the door frame and the supporting construction were filled with fireproof sealant with EPE sponge strip on both sides.

The door leaf framework was constructed by 1 . 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } thick U-type galvanized steel sheet. The door leaf had a core construction of 4 3 \ \mathsf {mm } thick multi-magnesium light mineral board sandwiched by 1 . 0 \mathsf {mm } thick galvanized steel sheet.

The door leaf incorporated a glazed aperture of nominal sight dimensions 7 0 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } high by 9 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } wide.The aperture of the door leaf was glazed with 6 ~ \mathsf {mm } thick glass panel. The glazing unit was retained with Z-type galvanized steel plate glazing bead of 1 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } by 19 mm by 2 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } by 1 . 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } thick.The glazing bead was fixed to the aperture framework by screwsatmaximum 2 5 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } centre to centre. 公

A 1 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } wide by 2 \mathsf {mm } thick intumescent seal was fitted into groove on the head, hinge and leading edges of the door leaf.A 1 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } wide by 2 \mathsf {mm } thick intumescent seal was fitted into overlap on the rebate of the door leaf.A 1 2 \mathsf {mm } by 1 2 \mathsf {mm } door stop smoke seal was glued to the head,left and right edges of the door frame.A drop seal was fitted into groove on the bottom edge of the door leaf. B

Client Ref. ABABS EN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

The door leaf was hung within a door frame by three stainless steel hinges.An overhead door closer was mounted on the unexposed surface of the door leaf.A door lock was installed into the door leaf which was latched but not locked for the duration of the test. The door leaf was provided with a magic eye at 1 5 0 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } from the bottom edge and the mid-width of the door leaf.

Thestructural framework ofthedrywallwasmadeof 5 0 ~ { \mathsf {mm } } x 5 0 ~ { \mathsf {mm } } x 1 . 2 ~ { \mathsf {mm } } zinc platedsteel C-channel, 3 5 \ {mm } x 1 2 \ {mm } x 1 . 2 \ {mm } zinc plated steel C-channel, 1 0 + 1 0 mm thick fire-resistant board mounted on each side of the galvanized steel frame with a layer of 5 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } thick mineral wool in the centre.The dry wall was fixed to the supporting constructionbyanchorboltsat themaximum 8 7 0 ~ { {mm } } centre to centre.

Eachlayerof 1 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } board was consisted of three pieces of boards，with nominal dimensions of 3 0 0 0 \ \mathsf {mm } high by 6 5 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } wide, 5 5 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } high by 1 2 0 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } wide and 3000 mm high by 6 4 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } wide respectively. The 1 0 \ \mathsf {mm } fire-resistant board were fixed to the framework with \Phi 3 . 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } x 3 8 ~ \mathsf {mm } and \Phi 3 . 8 ~ \mathsf {mm } x 5 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } screws at an approximate distance of 2 0 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } centre to centre.The gap between the boards was filled with acrylic intumescent sealant,and the gaps between the boards and the supporting construction were filledwith ceramic fiberblanket.

A description of the test specimen is shown in Schedule of Components and Figures 1 to 3. The description was based on a detailed survey of the test specimen,an additional of the test specimenand the information supplied by the client.

Fugro Technical Services (Guangzhou) Limited was not involved in the selection of the specimen.

The specimen was installed into a prepared opening of a supporting construction to form the test construction，and shownin Figure 4.Itwas mounted such that the door leaf opened away from the heating conditions of the test.The 2 8 ~ \mathsf {mm } gap between the free edge of the specimen on the right side,when viewed from the unexposed surface,and the supporting construction was filled with ceramic fibre blanket.

Installationwas conducted by the clienton 25June 2024.

After receiving,the specimen was stored in the test laboratory.Throughout this period of the storage,both the temperature and relative humidity of laboratory were measured and recorded as being within a range of from 2 4 . 2 { { ^ \circ C } } to 3 8 . 6 ^ { \circ } { C } and 4 3 . 1 % to 6 4 . 5 % （204号 respectively. 川

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM Page 5of35
Report No. G23245FU246120

Schedule of Components

(Refer to Figure1to3. Unless stated otherwise,all valuesare nominal,andall information in this Schedule of Components is supplied by the client.)

\*Verified by the laboratory before the test.# Measured by the laboratory.
\*\* Verified by the laboratory after the test and froman additional part of the test specimen.

Schedule of Components (cont'd)

Thickness 1mm\*\* Fixing method · Welding ^ + screw

5 Hinge

Manufacturer CANGZHOU SINONELOCK CO., LTD
Brand SINONE
Model CF5511CONSORT
Material 304stainless steel

Size i. knuckle ii. Blades Fixing method

120 mm long by 1 4 ~ \mathsf {mm } diameter \* 114 mm×102 mm×3.0 mm \* Screw

6 Door Lock (Latch)

Manufacturer CANGZHOUSINONELOCKCO.,LTD
Brand SINONE
Model ： 7255S-20R
Material ： 304stainless steel
Size ·· 235mm×84 mm×20mm \*
Fixing method ： Screw

7 Door Closer

Manufacturer
Brand
Model
Material
Size
Fixing method
CANGZHOUSINONELOCKCO.,LTD
SINONE
D103
Aluminum alloy
2 0 2 \mathsf {mm } x 4 4 \mathsf {mm } x 6 8 \mathsf {mm } ^ { \star }
Screw

8 Door Viewer

Brand ·： SINONE Model ·： DV002 Material · Zinc alloy

9 Intumescent Seal

Manufacturer Foshan Nanhai Chong Tai Fireproof Material Company Limited
Brand Fan Qiu \*Verified by the laboratory before the test.
\*\* Verified by the laboratory after the test and from an additional part of the test specimen.

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

Schedule of Components (cont'd)

Model
Size
Fixing method
Application location
FQ-C1-1502
15mm×2mm\*
Glued
1 no.of seal at the head, leading and hinge edges of the
doorleaf.\*
1 no.of seal at the rebate of the door leaf. \*

10 Door Stop Smoke Seal

Manufacturer

Brand T
Model
Size
Fixing method
Application location
Foshan Nanhai Chong Tai Fireproof Material Company
Limited
Fan Qiu
FQ-VA002
12mm×12mm\*
Glued
1 no. of seal at the head, left and right edges of
the door frame.\*

11Bottom Smoke Seal

Manufacturer
Brand
Model
Material
Size
Fixing method
Application location FoshanBohuaDecorationMaterial Co.,Ltd. Bohua
BH-M010
Aluminum alloy
34mmx14 mm\*
By screw
At the bottom of the door leaf \*

12Glass Panel

Manufacturer

HESHANHENGBAOFIRERESISTIANTGLASS FACTORYCO.,LTD.
Hengbao T
Borosilicate fire-resistant glass
6mm\* 知
743mmx133mm
700 mmx90 mm\*
Brand
Model
Thickness
Aperture size
Sight size

13Glazing Bead

Manufacturer ： ABANEW MATERIAL(GUANGDONG) CO,LTD
Material ： Galvanized steel plate
Density ： 7800-7900kg/m²

\*Verified by the laboratory before the test.

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM Page 8 of 35
Report No. G23245FU246120

Schedule of Components (cont'd)

Size 15mmx19 mm×20 mmx1.5 mm\*Z-shape Fixing method Screw Fixing frequency ： Atmaximum 2 5 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } centre to centre

14Dry Wall

Manufacturer Material

Overall size
Thickness
Composite stiffening ABA NEW MATERIAL (GUANGDONG) CO., LTD. 5 0 \ {mm } x 5 0 \ {mm } x 1 . 2 \ {mm } \ ( C-channel
3 5 \ : {mm } x 1 2 \ : {mm } x 1 . 2 \ : {mm } \ : ( C-channel
1 0 \mathsf {mm } thickABA Coral10850 fire-resistantboard 5 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } mineral wool
3000mm×2495mm\*
9 0 ~ {mm ^ { \star } } （204号
5 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } thickrockwool sandwiched by 1 0 {mm } + 1 0 {mm } ABA Coral 10850 fire-resistant board on each side.\* Fixed to the supporting construction byanchor
bolts at maximum 1 0 0 0 { {mm } } centre to centre. \*
\Phi 5 x 6 0 ~ {mm } anchor bolt \*

Fixingmethods to support construction Fixing material

15 C-Channel

Supplier
Material
Fixing method

ABANEWMATERIAL(GUANGDONG) CO.,LTD.5 0 \ : {mm } x 5 0 \ : {mm } x 1 . 2 \ : {mm } \ : ( C-channel3 5 \ : {mm } x 1 2 \ : {mm } x 1 . 2 \ : {mm } \ : ( C-channelFixedwithanchorbolt

16Rockwool

Supplier
Material
Density
Thickness
Fixing method ABANEWMATERIAL(GUANGDONG) CO.,LTD. Mineralwool
（204号 8 0 ~ \mathsf {kg } / \mathsf { m } ^ { 3 } （204号
50 mm\*
Free stand

17Fire-resistant Board

Supplier
Material
Density
Thickness
Fixing method
Fixing frequency ABANEWMATERIAL(GUANGDONG) CO.,LTD. ABACoral850 fire-resistantboard
8 5 0 { ± } 8 5 {kg / m ^ { 3 } }
10 mm\*
Fixedwith \Phi 3 . 5 \mathsf {mm } x 2 5 \mathsf {mm } and \Phi 3 . 5 {mm } x 3 8 {mm } self-tapping screws \*
Fixing to "C" channel at max 2 0 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } ^ { \star } centre to centre

\*Verified by the laboratory before the test.

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM Page 9 of 35
Report No. G23245FU246120

Schedule of Components (cont'd)

18Fire Sealant

Manufacturer
Brand
Model
Material
Application location
Foshan Hengdali Adhesive Products Co., Ltd
WEI S HIBO
999
Fireproof sealant
Gaps filling between the door frame and supporting
construction

19 Glue

Manufacturer Foshan Hengdali Adhesive Products Co.,Ltd
Brand BAIYUN
Model · SS5118
Material · Sealant

20BackerRod

Manufacturer Foshan Shunde Yuanmei Plastic Co., Ltd
Brand Yuanmei
Material EPE sponge strip
Size ： \emptyset \ 1 0 \ m \ m \*

\*Verified by the laboratory before the test.

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM ReportNo. G23245FU246120

Figure 2

Client Ref. ABABS EN60 FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

Figure5-PositionsofFurnaceThermocouples

\bigcirc positions of furnace thermocouples All dimensions are in mm.

Client Ref. ABABS EN60FIREDOOR-GFM Page 15 of 35 Report No. G23245FU246120

5. Equipment

Nine plate thermocoupleswere installedand maintained 1 0 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } away from the exposed surface of the specimen to monitor the furnace temperature.The positions of the furnace thermocouplesare shown in Figure5.

Apressure sensorwas installed to control the furnace pressure.

Thermocouples were installed to monitor the temperature of the unexposed surface of the specimen at the following positions.

a)Atthirteen positions on the door leaf,one approximatelyat the centre of the door leaf and one approximately at the centre of each quarter section, two at mid-height, 1 0 0 ~ { {mm } } （204号 in from the vertical edges, two at 1 0 0 ~ { {mm } } in from the vertical edges and 1 0 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } down from the horizontal edge, two at mid-height, 2 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } in from the vertical edges,and two at 2 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } in from the vertical edges, 2 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } down from the horizontal edge.

b)At three positions on the frame,one at the mid-height on each vertical member,and two on the horizontal members, 5 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } infromcornerof frame.

c)At five positions on the dry wall,one approximately at the centre of the dry wall and oneapproximatelyat the centre of each quarter section.

d)At five positions on the dry wall which may be expected to reach higher temperatures than the average surface temperature,were located at positions not exceeding 2 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } whenmeasuredfromjointtothecentreofthethermocouple.

e)The positions and reference numbers of the various unexposed surface thermocouples are shown in Figure 4.

A roving thermocouple was provided to measure temperature on the unexposed surface of the specimen at any position that might appear to be hoter than the temperatures indicated by the fixed thermocouples.

Cotton pads and gap gauges were provided to evaluate the integrity of the specimen.

A steel ruler was provided to measure the lateral deflections of the specimen relative to laser line.The measurement positions are shown in Figure 6.

A thermocouple was provided to monitor ambient temperature at a distance approximately 1 5 0 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } away from the test construction.

Client Ref. ABABS EN60 FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

6. Test Procedure

6.1 Pre-test examination and preparation

Prior to the fire resistance test，the doorset was subjected to 25 manually operated opening and closing cycles and measured the closing speed as specified in BS EN 16034: 2014.

Gaps，closing forces were measured as specified in BS EN 1634-1: 2014+A1:2018, Clause 10.1.2.and 10.1.3. The doorset was subjected to final setting as specified in BS EN1634-1:2014+A1:2018,Clause 10.1.4.

6.2Fire resistance test

The test was conducted in accordance with the procedure specified in BS EN 1634-1: 2 0 1 4 + A 1 : 2 0 1 8 ,Clause 10.2.

The ambient temperature of test area was measured at commencement of the test.

The furnace temperature was controled so that the average furnace temperature and tolerances complied with the requirements of BS EN 1363-1:2020，Clause 5.1. Nine furnace thermocouples were used to determine the average furnace temperature.

The furnace pressure was controlled so that it complied with the requirements of BS EN 1363-1:2020，Clause 5.2. The calculated furnace pressure relative to the laboratory atmosphereatthetopofthedoorsetwas 1 7 . 0 ± 3 Pa.

The temperature of the unexposed surface was monitored by means of twenty-six thermocouples fixed to the unexposed surface of the specimen.Thermocouple1 to 5 were used to determine the average temperature of the unexposed surface of the door leaf. Thermocouples 17 to 21 was used to determine the average temperature of the unexposed surface of the fire panel.Thermocouple 1 to 5，10 to 13 were used to determine the maximum temperature (normal procedure) of the unexposed surface of the doorleaf.Thermocouples6to9were usedto determine the maximum temperature (supplementary procedure) of the unexposed surface of the door leaf.Thermocouple 17 to 26 were used to determine the maximum temperature of the unexposed surface of the fire panel.Thermocouples 14 to 16 were used to determine the maximum temperature of the unexposed surface of the door frame. D

During the test, the temperatures and pressures were continuously monitored and were recordedatoneminuteintervals.

Theroving thermocouple was also used，if considered necessary，to determine compliancewith the insulation criterion.

Cotton pads and gap gauges were used to determine compliance with the integrity criteria. The specimen was also monitored for the occurrence of any sustained flaming on the unexposed surface which would result on failure to comply with the integrity criteria.

A steel ruler was used to measure the lateral deflection of the specimen during the test.

7.Test Data and Information

The closing speed of the door leaf was 1 7 4 . 8 \ : {mm / s } 元

Gapsbetween thedoor leaf and the door frameare shown in Figure6.

The retention forces were shown as follows:

\* Viewed from the unexposed surface

Thefollowingdatawere recordedduringthe fireresistancetest:

a)The actual average furnace temperature / timecurve as well as the standard furnace temperature/time curve,are shownin Figure7.
b) The furnace pressures relative to laboratory atmosphere，at a height of approximately 2 0 0 0 \ {mm } above the bottom of the specimen,are shown in Figure 8.
c）The average and maximum temperature rises of the unexposed surface of the specimen measured by fixed surface thermocouples (normal procedure）are shown in Figure 9 and 10.The individual temperatures recorded on the unexposed surface of the specimen are shown in Table 1.
d）The lateral deflections of the specimen are shown in Table 2.

A summary of the observations made on the general behaviour of the specimen is given in Table 3.

The ambient air temperature in the vicinity of the test construction was 3 2 . 7 ^ { \circ } { C } at the start of the test and increased by 0 . 9 { { ^ \circ C } } at the termination of test.

Figure 7-Gapsmeasured between Door Leaf and Door Frame asViewed from the Unexposed Surface

All dimensions are in mm.

Dimensions shown in brackets were measured from the exposed surface.

Figure9-Furnace PressuresRelative to theLaboratoryAtmosphere

Graphshowingrecorded furnace pressureat 2 0 0 0 \mathsf {mm } above the bottom of the specimen.

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

Figure 10 - Average Temperature Rises of the Unexposed Surface of the Specimen

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

Figure11- Maximum Temperature Rises (Normal Procedure) of the Unexposed Surface of theSpecimen Measuredby Fixed Surface Thermocouples

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

ClientRef.:ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM ReportNo.: G23245FU246120

智

Positive deflections indicate movement towards the heat source.

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

Client Ref. ABABS EN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

8.Performance Criteria

The performance of the specimen was assessed against the criteria for integrity and insulation in accordance with BS EN 1634-1: 2 0 1 4 + A 1 : 2 0 1 8 and BS EN 1364-1:2015.The performancecriteria forfailurewere givenas follows:

Integrity (E): The test specimen continues to maintain its separating function during the test without either:

a) causing the ignition of a cotton pad when applied; or b) permitting the penetration of a gap gauge as follows: i) whether the 6 ~ \mathsf {mm } gap gauge can be passed through the test specimen such that the gauge projects into the furnace,and can be moved a distance of 1 5 0 ~ \mathsf {mm } along the gap; or ii) whether the 2 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } gap gauge can passed through the specimen such that the gauge projects into the furnace; or c）resulting in sustained flaming fora period of time greater than 10 seconds.
Insulation (l):The test specimen continues to maintain its separating function during the test
without developing temperatures on itsunexposed surface which either: a)increase the average temperature above the initial average temperature by more than 1 4 0 ^ { \circ } \mathsf { C } or b）i）increase at any location of dry wall partition system (including the roving thermocouple) above the initial average temperaturebymore than 1 8 0 ^ { \circ } { C } ： ii) increase at any location (including the roving thermocouple) above the initial average temperature bymore than \boldsymbol { 1 8 0 ^ { \circ } C } [Supplementary procedure- Classification l1].

The performance criteria“insulation”shall automatically be assumed not to be satisfied when the“integrity"criterion ceases to be satisfied.

Client Ref. ABABS EN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

9. Conclusion

A specimen of a drywall partition system containing a single-acting，single-leaf,metal doorset with a glazed panel has beensubjected toa fire resistance test inaccordance withBSEN1364-1:2015andBSEN1634-1: 2 0 1 4 + A 1 : 2 0 1 8

The fire resistance performance of the specimen was judged against the criteria for integrity and insulation,and the specimen satisfied the performance requirements for the following period:

The test was discontinued after a period of 68 minutes at the request of the client.

10. Field of Direct Application of Test Results

General: The field of direct application defines the allowable changes to the test specimen following a successful fire resistance test.These variations can be applied automatically without the need for the sponsor to seek additional evaluation,calculation or approval.

Dry wall partition system:

Materialsand construction-General:

Unless otherwise stated in the following text the materials and construction of the tested assemblyshallbe thesameas thattested.

Theresults of the fire test are directly applicable to similar constructions where one or more of the changes listed below are made and the construction continues to comply with theappropriate designcode for its stiffnessand stability.

a)The heightof the construction may be decreased.
b)The thickness of the construction may be increased.
c) The thickness of component materials may be increased.
d) The linear dimensions of boards or panels but not thickness may be decreased.
e) The stud spacing may be decreased.
f)Thedistance of fixing centresof boards or panels maybe decreased.
g)The number of fixings used to attach the steel frame to supporting frame may increase and the distance between fixings may be decreased.

Extension of width: The width of an identical construction may be increased.

Doorset:

Materials and construction-General: Unless otherwise stated in the following text, the materials and construction of the doorset or openable window shallbe the same as that tested.The number of leaves and the mode of operation (e.g. sliding，single action or double action) shall not be changed.

Specific restrictions on materials and construction:

a) Metal constructions:The dimensions of metal wrap around frames may be increased to accommodate increased supporting construction thickness.The thickness of the metal mayalso be increasedbyupto 2 5 % .Thetypeof metal shallnotbechangedfromthat tested.The number of stiffening elements for uninsulated doors and the number and type of fixings of such members within the panel fabrication may be increased proportionally with the increase in size but shall not be reduced.

Client Ref. ABABS EN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

b) Glazed constructions: The type of glass and the edge fixing technique,including type and number of fixings per metre of perimeter, shall not be changed from those tested.The number of glazed apertures and each of the dimensions (width and height) of glass may be decreasedbyamaximumof 2 5 % in proportion with door size reductions but shall notbe increased.The distance between the edge of glazing and the perimeter of the door leaf,or thedistancebetween glazedaperturesshallnotbereduced.

Decorative finished: Paint finish are acceptable and may be added to door leaves or frames.

Decorative laminates: Decorative laminates and timber veneers up to 1 . 5 ~ \mathsf {mm } thickness maybe added to the faces (but not the edges) of doors.

Fixings: The number of fixings per unit length used to atach doorset to supporting constructions may be increased but shall not be decreased and the distance between fixingsmaybe reduced butshall notbe increased.

Building hardware: The number of hinges and dog bolts may be increased but shall not be decreased.

Permissible size variations - General: Doorsets of sizes different from those of the tested specimen are permitted within certain limitations but the variations are dependent on product type and the length of time that the performance criteria are fulfilled.

Specific size variations: Unlimited size reduction is permitted for alltypes except insulated metal doors where a reduction to 50 % width and 7 5 % height of the tested specimen is the limit of variation.Size increase may be permited,depending on the required classification period,in line with 13.3 of BS EN 1 6 3 4 - 1 : 2 0 1 4 + \mathsf { A } 1 : 2 0 1 8

Other changes: For smaller doorset sizes the relative positioning of movement restrictors (e.g.hinges,latches,etc) shallremain the same as tested orany change to the distances between them will be limited to the same percentage reduction as the decrease of test specimen size.

Asymmetrical doorsets - General: BS EN 1363-1 states that for separating elements required to be fire resisting from both sides,two test specimens shall be tested (one from each direction) unless the element is fuly symmetrical,i.e.the construction of the doorset is identical on both sides of acentre line when viewed in plan (fromabove). However,in some cases it is possible to develop rules whereby the fire resistance of anasymmetrical door assembly tested in one direction can apply when the fire exposure is from the other direction.The possibility to develop such rules increases if the consideration is limited to certain types of door assembly and on the criteria being applicable (e.g.integrity only doors) The following rules represent the minimum level of common agreement which shall be followed. The rationale behind the rules is given in Annex C of BS EN 1634-1: 2014+A1:2018．

Client Ref. ABA BS EN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

Supporting constructions -General: The fire resistance of a door assembly tested in one form of standard supporting construction may or may not apply when it is mounted in other types of construction. However,insome cases it is possible for the result ofa test on a particular type of door assembly tested in one form of standard supporting construction to be applicable to that door assembly when mounted in a different type of standard supporting construction.

Specific rules: For insulated metal door leaves hung in metal frames， there is no applicability of results in rigid standard supporting construction to flexible constructions or vice versa.To cover rigid and flexible types,tests shall be undertaken in each type of standard supporting construction.

11.Limitation

Theresults only relate to the behaviour of the specimen of the element of construction under the particular conditions of the test.Theyare not intended to be the sole criteria for assessing the potential fire performance of the element in use,nor do they reflect the actual behaviour in fires. X

This report details the method of construction,the test conditions and the results obtained when the specific element of construction described herein was tested folowing the procedure outlined in BS EN 1363-1,and where appropriate BS EN 1363-2.Any significant deviation with respect to size,constructional details,edge or end conditions other than those allowed under the field of direct application in the relevant test method is not cover by this report. 1

Because of the nature of fire resistance testing and consequent difficulty in quantifying the uncertainty of measurement of fire resistance,it is not possible to provide a stated degree of accuracy of the result.

Client Ref. ：ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFMReport No. G23245FU246120

Appendix A - Test Photographs

Photo 1-Theunexposed surface of the specimen before the test

Photo 2-The unexposed surface of the specimen during the test

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

Photo 3 -The unexposed surface of the specimen during the test

Photo 4-The unexposed surface of the specimen after the test

Client Ref. ABABSEN60FIREDOOR-GFM Report No. G23245FU246120

Photo 5 -The exposed surface of the specimen after the test